New search
download case
  • Overview
  • Teaching Notes
  • Answer Key
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Comments/Replies

Tuna for Lunch?

A Case Study Examining Mercury Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification



Author:

Caralyn B. Zehnder
Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences
Georgia College & State University
caralyn.zehnder@gcsu.edu

Abstract:

This case examines mercury bioaccumulation and biomagnification within the context of the human health impacts of ingesting food (specifically, fish) contaminated with mercury. It was inspired by a 2009 USGS report on mercury in fish, sediment, and water from streams across the U.S. The case is intended to help students make the connection between an environmental contaminant (mercury, a neurotoxin) and the food they eat. Human activities have been increasing mercury concentrations globally, and coal-burning power plants are the most common source of mercury pollution, a fact many students are unaware of. The case has been used in an introductory level environmental science class (predominantly non-majors), a non-majors general biology class, and a sophomore level ecology class (majors).

Objectives:
  • Explain why there are fish consumption advisories related to mercury.
  • Explain how mercury enters and moves through the environment.
  • Read, interpret, and apply scientific data presented in graphs and tables for this case study.
  • Define biomagnification and explain how it leads to higher concentrations of toxins in animals that are higher up the food chain.
  • Explore how biomagnification occurs in other systems and with other compounds (if students complete optional final activity).
Keywords: Biomagnification; bioaccumulation; mercury; neurotoxin; fish consumption; tuna; food chain; food web; trophic; coal-burning
Topical Area: N/A
Educational Level: High school, Undergraduate lower division, Undergraduate upper division
Formats: PDF, PowerPoint
Type/Method: Interrupted
Language: English
Subject Headings: Environmental Science   Ecology   Biology (General)   Limnology   Toxicology   Public Health  
Date Posted: 12/14/2010
Date Modified: N/A
Copyright: Copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work.

Teaching Notes


Case teaching notes are password-protected and access to them is limited to paid subscribed instructors. To become a paid subscriber, begin the process by registering here.

Teaching notes are intended to help teachers select and adopt a case. They typically include a summary of the case, teaching objectives, information about the intended audience, details about how the case may be taught, and a list of references and resources.

  Download Teaching Notes

Answer Key


Answer keys for the cases in our collection are password-protected and access to them is limited to paid subscribed instructors. To become a paid subscriber, begin the process by registering here.


  Get Answer Key

Supplemental Materials


The case includes a PowerPoint presentation (~2.9MB) that can be used in conjunction with the case, as described in the teaching notes for the case.

  Mercury in Fish Power Point
As a former high school environmental science teacher and college professor (biochemist), I found your case history very relevant to the dangers of mercury pollution. There is a very urgent need to get this information into the hands of the next generation of citizens.

You might include the politics and economics of controlling mercury pollution as another component to your case history. It could be used as an extra credit project to further understand how science and politics interact with each other in the real world.

Additional information you might find useful:

  1. The CDC has estimated that as many as 600,000 newborns are at risk from methyl mercury from the fish consumed.
  2. The California gold rush over one hundred years ago used mercury to mine for gold and today mercury is still contaminating rivers and lakes in those mining areas.
  3. The ongoing National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey indicate that people living in coastal areas have higher levels of mercury in their blood than individuals living elsewhere.
  4. Check out the www.cleanair.org, www.GotMercury.org, www.who.int/ceh, and www.zeromercury.org as well as Dr. Hightower's book "Diagnosis: Mercury, Money, Politics & Poison" (2009).

I hope you will find these comments useful.


Mervyn H. Kline
Mercury Pollution Specialist
Clean Air Council

mkline@cleanair.org
12/20/2010




Name:
Email:
Department:
Institution:
City State:
Comments:
security code
Enter Security Code: