- Overview
- Teaching Notes
- Answer Key
- Comments/Replies
The Case of the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker
The Scientific Process and How it Relates to Everyday Life
| Co Authors: |
Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall Jennifer Merriam Ruth Ann Greuling |
| Abstract: | Based on the disputed rediscovery of the ivory-billed woodpecker in April 2005, this interrupted case study tells the story of a fictional character, "Brad Murky," a student and research assistant who must decide whether the current evidence is sufficient for him to accept the bird's existence. Brad and his sister debate the issue through a series of emails leaving him to wonder whether the press conference to announce the rediscovery of the bird was scheduled in haste. Designed for an introductory biology course, this case would also work well in an ecology, environmental science, environmental public policy, ornithology, or science and society course. |
| Objectives: |
|
| Keywords: | Ivory-billed woodpecker; Campephilus principalis; birds; Cache National Wildlife Refuge; Arkansas |
| Topical Area: | Policy issues, Scientific method, Science and the media |
| Educational Level: | High school, Undergraduate lower division |
| Formats: | |
| Type/Method: | Dilemma/Decision, Interrupted |
| Language: | English |
| Subject Headings: | Biology (General) Environmental Science Natural Resource Management Science (General) Ecology |
| Date Posted: | 08/05/07 |
| Date Modified: | N/A |
| Copyright: | Copyright held by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work. |
Teaching Notes
Case teaching notes are intended to help teachers select and adopt a case. They typically include a summary of the case, teaching objectives, information about the intended audience and how the case may be taught, a case analysis or answer key, and references.
Answer Key
Answer keys provide answers to the questions posed in a case study. Since these questions are intended to be answered by students and are often graded, answer keys are password-protected and access to them is limited to registered instructors.
I used this case in an upper level environmental science class to review the scientific process. The students came up with some great pieces of evidence for Part I and named physical evidence that they could repeatedly test for authentication. For Part II they made great observations, but then for Part III they seemed to totally forget the evidence that they came up with for Part I and were swayed by the video as sufficient evidence. The students also had problems applying their discussion for this case to other types of environmental problems/policy (Part III, Question 5).
I think it would be helpful to have students also examine another environmental issue like global warming, and go through what evidence they would need, what evidence we have, and how to interpret the data.
Diane Herr
Science Department
Waterford High School
Waterford, CT 06385
dherr@waterfordschools.org
9/8/2009