The Return of Canis lupus?
Mitchell Community College
Although gray wolves once freely roamed North America, the gradual loss of their habitat from westward expansion and extermination programs led to their demise in the early 20th century. Many argue that predators such as wolves benefit a functioning ecosystem. In 1995, following years of extensive planning and controversy, wolves were brought from Canada and restored to Yellowstone National Park. This case study provides students with an opportunity to integrate various abstract ecological concepts (trophic cascades, keystone species, interspecific versus intraspecific interactions) with applied ecology as they learn about the wolf reintroduction debate and the conservation of an ecosystem. As part of their case work, students formulate and present a management plan. Originally designed for a college ecology course, this case has also been successfully used with both majors and non-majors in basic biology courses. Students will need some background knowledge of community and population structure within ecosystems.
- Explain ecological concepts as they are set in the context of an ongoing controversy.
- Differentiate between interspecific and intraspecific interactions.
- Differentiate between density-dependent and density-independent factors as they relate to population size.
- Define carrying capacity.
- Understand how wolves are linked to a trophic cascade mechanism.
- Understand why the wolf is considered a keystone species.
- Analyze data sets.
- Develop literature review skills.
- Apply information from research and behavior to a management plan.
KeywordsWolf; wolves; Canis lupus; animal behavior; trophic cascade; carrying capacity; interspecific competition; intraspecific competition; density-independent factors; density-dependent factors; keystone species; food web; community; Yellowstone National Park
Topical AreasEthics, Regulatory issues
Educational LevelHigh school, Undergraduate lower division, Undergraduate upper division
Type / MethodsAnalysis/Issues, Discussion, Interrupted, Student Presentations
Subject HeadingsEcology | Wildlife Management | Biology (General) |
The supplemental material below may be used in conjunction with this case.Click-and-Learn: Exploring Trophic Cascades
Answer keys for the cases in our collection are password-protected and access to them is limited to paid subscribed instructors. To become a paid subscriber, begin the process by registering.
The following video(s) are recommended for use in association with this case study.
- Some Animals are More Equal than Others
This short film opens with two questions: "So what determines how many species live in a given place? Or how many individuals of the species can live somewhere?" The research that provided answers to these questions was set in motion by key experiments by ecologists Robert Paine and James Estes. The film discusses Paine's starfish exclusion experiments on the coast of Washington state as well as Estes' and colleague John Palmisano's discovery that the kelp forest ecosystems of the North Pacific are regulated by the presence or absence of sea otters, which feed on sea urchins that consume kelp. These early studies were the inspiration for hundreds of investigations on other keystone species and trophic cascades, as well as ongoing studies into the regulation of population sizes and species numbers. Running time: 19:29 min. Produced by HHMI BioInteractive.
- Film Guide for "Some Animals are More Equal than Others"
Film guide as well as instructor materials and a student quiz that complement the film "Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others: Trophic Cascades and Keystone Species." Produced by HHMI BioInteractive.